Sean Maguire’s Weblog
Just a bit of my thoughtsThe Future of PR, Part Two
Upon reading and reviewing others’ opinions on the future of public relations, mine has changed a bit. My thoughts have changed from thinking everything will be online to, quite honestly, not having any idea. Let me explain myself.
I still think it is a very real possibility that public relations will become exclusively online and more independent, but others have made me look at the future of public relations from different view points.
For example, John Paluszek’s, Senior Counsel, Ketchum, and APR, Fellow PRSA, blog entry made me see things in a different light. Instead of trying to figure out what the public relations field would become, I realized that we relate to what happens in the world. Just like any relationship, you have to react to what the other party does; you can’t expect to have a good relationship if you dictate everything that happens.
In Paluszek’s entry, which also appeared in the fall 2007 issue of The Public Relations Strategist, he suggests that the field of public relations is changed and developed by the circumstances around it, or in the world. He references World War II and how affected people and the field of public relations.
He says that we, as public relations practitioners, must evolve and grow to keep good relations in our changing society.
The most compelling part of his entry is at the end, when he says the following:
“So the related questions for every PR practitioner and educator are as follows: How will you and your organization or institution fit into this kind of world? How will you prosper in this social environment? And what can the PR canon and portfolio, as they continue to evolve, contribute to a better society?
“No one can answer these for you.
“But the answers will be apparent for each of us who is as creative, bold and dedicated as those who preceded us in public relations 60 years ago.”
It is definitely interesting to think about where public relations will be in 60 years; but I think that it is impossible to predict t, just as it was impossible to predict where we are today to those who pioneered the field many years ago.
Paluszek’s blog can be viewed at http://www.ketchum.com/node/1094.
Richard Edelman also had some interesting pointers in his November 2005 entry on the future of public relations.
He outlined where the field was today, 2005 at the time of his entry, by presenting several astonishing facts, which I’m sure are even more astonishing today in 2008.
For example, he says, “An estimated 24 million homes in the US now have access to video on demand.”
After presenting several facts like this, he gives the following three main suggestions for the next year (2006) that can be applied to the field for several years to come: 1. Retrain our work force. 2. Recognize the influence and credibility of blogs. 3. Experiment.
I agree that all these suggestions are important to public relations. We must keep our work force high to promote competition, experience and opportunity; we must recognize the growing realm of blogging to keep up with the developing world; and we must experiment to come up with new, effective ways of mass communication so we can help the world’ communication methods develop ourselves.
Edelman’s blog can be viewed at http://www.edelman.com/speak_up/blog/archives/2005/11/is_public_relat.html.
The varying opinions on how public relations will change and what we need to do make it happen are good to hear and can be a great learning experience to study, but the fact of the matter is, we must adapt to, and we will be greatly affected by the world around us.
With all of this said, I honestly don’t have any idea what the field of public relations will develop into, but I can’t wait to find out and enjoy the ride.
The Future of Public Relations
I see the future of public relations as one that will continue to grow and expand in ways that we never thought possible. I think changing technology and improved methods of instant and inexpensive communication will change the field of public relations and make it more important in the corporate world than ever before.
With all the communication advances that keep coming and developing online, I think public relations professionals will cut out the media middlemen in some aspects. I think that pubic relations people will communicate directly with the public through e-mail or social media releases and give information directly to the public whenever they need it. Public relations will no longer be dependant on the media, but will deliver important news themselves online.
The field of public relations, along with the information it provides, is growing and becoming more instant, effective and accessible than ever before. I see the trend continuing and public relations gainning more and more power. The field will change just as fast as our world does and will take us places we ‘ve never dreamed of.
The NBA/MLB Draft
Our assignment today is to write something persuasive. Since I am majoring in Sports Media, I figured it would be a good idea to write about something sports related. Therefore, I chose the draft age limit debate.
I believe that the MLB and NBA should change their draft age rstrictions to match the NFL’s. The NFL requires that a player must have graduated high school three years prior to the draft in order to be eligible. This rule gives kids the chance to get an education and develop their skills, and teams a chance to evaluate players more thouroughly before they decide if they want to take a chance on them.
There isn’t an age restiction in the MLB, and there are countless examples of high school kids who miss college for baseball and fall out the professional ranks after a few years. There is a trend of more and more kids doing this and it needs to stop. It benefits no one. The kids miss out on an education and the chance to compete in college, colleges miss out on several good players and professional teams waste time and money on players who aren’t ready to compete at the top level of play.
The NBA also needs to change its draft age restriction, which requires a player to be one year removed from high school to be eligible. Although this rule is better than the previous age restriction (none), it still has room for improvement. If a player was required to compete at the college level for three years, then all the same benefits as the already mentioned MLB would come into effect.
I realize there are several exceptions to these benefits, such as Kobe Bryant, Greg Oden, Derek Jeter, Ken Griffey Jr. and others; but there are 20 players that don’t make it for every one that does. It is simply not worth one players’ early success for 20 players’ permanent falls. This is way the draft age restrictions of the NBA and MLB should match that of the NFL.
Here we go…
Well, this is my first ever blog post, so don’t expect anything too great just yet. I created this blog about half an hour ago for my PR Communication class. Although I am technically starting this for my class, I have been thinking about starting one for a few months now and I’m glad that something has finally given me the iniative to. I think it is a great chance for me to work on my writing skills and get something out there for the world to see! I hope everyone enjoys it! I’m looking forward to a great time!
-SM